I’ll deal with the first of these in this article. This is my list.
In fact, that last point applies to many other recent technological leaps – Bill Gates didn’t invent the PC or programming, Steve Jobs didn’t invent the MP3 player (that was Creative Inc), and the Google guys didn’t invent the worldwide web – also, there were other search engines (such as Yahoo!) in the market before them. But they all added their own creative input to make a new product, not to mention a lot of money. That’s just the business and technical side of creativity.
There’s also the personal business of feeling good about one’s own life. I don’t know you personally, but there’s a good chance that you’re familiar with that special kind of feel-good factor from coming up with an idea and then seeing it delivering a useful result – and that’s the case even if that result is not in the financial mega-bucks category.
On the other side of this issue is the copious amount of research about stress and its effects on the brain: a stressed brain makes dumb mistakes or goes blank. Several authors fit this model – people prefer to be in a relaxed frame of mine while ‘in creative mode’. Two examples are Ian Fleming writing the James Bond novels while relaxing in his Caribbean home; or the great novelist Johan Goethe, who enjoyed a very well-balanced life while producing some of the greatest literature of Germany.
Resolving this paradox is fairly straightforward: just notice what works. I mention it here because I have heard so many stories where people try to pressure creativity, and it doesn’t work. But they keep trying, sticking with the same formula. Also, I’ve often heard the line: ‘Come up with some good ideas, or you’re fired.” It’s an approach that generally doesn’t work with most people.
According to Scientific American (July 18, 2012), an average human brain consumes 20% of the energy we eat as food, which works out as 260 calories per day. And that works out as 12.6 Watts: which is equivalent to the electricity consumption of the light bulb in a refrigerator. That’s the energy input to the brain.
The interesting part is the output, of which some is the electrical energy of our thoughts. It’s microscopic, as a tiny impulse of electrical energy flowing along the dendrites that connect our neurons – and that happens every time we think. There is no doubt that our brains are continuously active (even when we sleep, by dreaming). The question is: where is that thinking energy going? It’s either coming up with creative ideas that are useful or it isn’t.
Another useful factor in this analysis is the fact that, nature cannot stand a vacuum. If something is removed, something else will take its place. There is a parallel process with how our brains use their thinking energy. If you stop thinking about one thing, the chances are you’ll end up thinking about something else instead.
One thing you can do to improve your idea generation capability is to follow the simple arithmetic process of removing items from your thinking time which aren’t to do with generating ideas. Methods for this range from Dr Gates in Napoleon Hill’s classic self-help book Think and Grow Rich where Dr Gates would sit in a dark silent room for hours, “waiting for ideas”, to someone just skipping a TV game show to think about ideas for half an hour instead. The critical thing to remember is that the time taken for your brain to produce a good idea and be processed and recognised is very fast – say one second. The scary thing is that it’s so easy to miss it by having your brain do something else instead at that particular second; even scarier is: once it’s missed, it could stay missed for the rest of your life.
It may seem contradictory on the surface to say that a creative person is also the kind of person who says things like: ‘a place for everything and everything in its place’ but the fact is that a creative person values his brain power and where that power gets focused. Almost anything is better than using your brain for looking for a misplaced pen or file or car-keys.
One of my favourite examples is on the topic of the news. How much (if any) benefit is there from the news? Its content (and I’m deliberately not using the word ‘information’) is generally negative and highly non-actionable to the audience. For the most part, all the audience does is mutter: “Oh, that’s terrible” and sigh. A brain that is focusing on negative news is, generally, a brain that is not doing something creative instead.
Creativity is a massive subject. One key point is that there is nothing in the world of creativity that can’t be taken in some form or other, and applied and used in the edible oils and fats industry. All that is needed is a decision to ‘go for it’ and to reward the folks who deliver it – even if they can be annoying sometimes!
Dr Ian Halsall
Author & Researcher
Part 2 of this article will appear in the next issue.
Pages : 1 2